The Tree Of Life

Director: Terrence Malick

2011

“[The Tree of Life] has divided audiences more radically than almost any other ilm so far this century. For its supporters, The Tree of Life is a masterpiece – a sublime spiritual mediation on life, destiny, childhood, memory, and our place in the universe. For its detractors, who booed it heartily at its premiere at the 2011 Cannes Festival (where it went on to win the Palme D’Or), it’s a windy, pretentious self-indulgence that makes naive gestures toward cosmic significance.” (932, Philip Kemp, 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die) I am quite firmly placed in the detractors camp and have been since I watched The Tree of Life for the first time. I’m not sure I would have booed it had I been at Cannes but I definitely came away feeling confused and disappointed, a feeling that if anything has only increased with watching the film again.

Tree of LifeThe Tree of Life has virtually no plot” (932) which meant I often lost focus. I said in my previous review that it wouldn’t be out-of-place in an art gallery and I stand by it. It would be perfect as an installation somewhere but I don’t think it works as a feature film.

As Kemp says “what both camps agree upon, though, is that it’s breathtakingly lovely to look at.’ (932) and that is undeniably true. While I don’t like the film as a whole I can certainly appreciate the incandescent visuals created under the talented eye of Emmanuel Lubezki, whose nomination for Cinematography was richly deserved. I liked that many of the shots are from unusual perspectives or focus on different aspects within the frames as well as the recurring images of hands, sky and trees, usually shot from a low upward angle.

“Controversy over the film homes in on a seventeen-minute chapter that erupts unheralded into the narrative: a wordless history of the universe from galactic eruptions through protozoic life-forms to computer generated dinosaurs.”(932) I am right there with the controversy. I was extremely confused by the appearance of the dinosaurs. They are rendered beautifully but they seem so out-of-place which is saying something in a film with no plot or narrative. It’s almost as if someone has spliced a section of the wrong film into it during the editing process but for the fact it was edited digitally.

Sadly I don’t think the arresting visuals are enough to truly hold my attention and I doubt I will watch it again.

Advertisements

One thought on “The Tree Of Life

  1. rorydean says:

    Hi’ya, stumbling around trying to catch up on some much over due blog readings..caught this one and thought I’d drop a note and say hello. Wow, gee – I can’t agree more with your thoughts on this one. Both beautiful and deeply frustrating, something you want to like but ultimately give up on as though finding the value in the movie will inevitably cost much more than abandoning it along the way. I reviewed this one myself, over at Above The Line and would enjoy your thoughts if you’re so inclined. Personally, I think the film was always intended to inspire people to discussions more than any one particular experience of the film – or trying to figure out what the hell it’s about. Enjoyed your thoughts, cheers-> http://rorydean.wordpress.com/2012/09/09/tree-of-life-2011/

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s